every once in awhile, remove

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

I guess it was almost two years ago when I first came across Eric Pickersgill’s series of photographs, Removed. I remember it clearly: I was sitting in a big lecture hall at the Sorbonne, waiting for my terrifying Parisian Film professor to begin his 3-hour lecture.

Once we started discussing the work of Brian De Palma, Francis Ford Coppola, and others, the photographs disappeared from my mind. That is, until one day last semester while working on a project in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at Emory Hospital Midtown.

Surrounded by incubators and the tiniest of newborn babies, one of the doctors with whom I was working explained how he consistently has to encourage parents and family to actually interact with their babies?

I didn’t quite understand, and indicated that he should go on in further detail. The reason, Dr. Sexson said, is because people have become so attached (if not addicted) to their phones that they forget where they are and why.

Emory Midtown NICU.JPGStudies have found that speaking and singing to, cuddling, and just loving premature infants do so much in the formative weeks and months that these little fighters spend at Emory Midtown and NICUs across the world. But these actions continue to have an impact on the babies once they make it home⎯ as they grow into toddlers and young adults and eventually have their own children.

Despite the doctor’s pleadings, Sexson notices increasing numbers of new mothers who are more interested in their phones than with their babies.

As soon as I heard this, I was completely deflated. Honestly, just seeing the little newborns was moving and heart-wrenching in itself. But this took my emotions to a new level. I couldn’t help but look at technology in a new light.

I mean what on Earth⎯ or in the palms of our hands⎯ could be more important than these bundles of joy, who need and deserve nothing but love and attention?

That’s when I thought of Removed, and did a little more research on the series of photos I hadn’t thought about for a year. Almost every major newspaper, magazine and website⎯ our friends at Wired, but also The Atlantic, Fast Company, and so many more⎯ had covered Pickersgill’s work. He even has his own TED talk, “Do Our Devices Divide Us?”

Artist and Photographer“We are hopelessly hooked,” Jacob Weisberg of The Slate Group wrote in one review.

“You’re so accustomed to everyone holding a phone, you might not even notice they’re missing,” said another reviewer.

The more I think about it, the truer it all sounds.

I call to mind Kathleen’s final project. When she went off the grid for just a day or two, her life went up in flames. Her parents freaked, she missed class, and just felt totally out of it.

The other day my friend, a student at the University of Pennsylvania, told me what she thought was a funny story. Cooped up at the library in efforts to get schoolwork done, she put her phone away. She didn’t think anyone needed to call or beep her.
Her mom texted her, and of course got no response. So her mom texted her again. 30, 40 minutes went by and there was no word from Liza. 
Her mom— although this might sound like a joke, it is not and I can provide proof—  back home in Chicago started panicking. She realized what the problem was: Liza had been abducted.
She proceeded to notify her daughter’s roomie, informing her she had not been in touch with Liza for an hour. And I kid you not, sent the words “Acking tray own-phay” to her daughter with the hope that her abductor would not understand.
For those of us who do not use Pig Latin in everyday life, this means “tracking phone.”
At this point, Liza decided to take a study break. When she stepped outside, she noticed numerous calls and text messages. She proceeded to inform her mother and worried friends that she was, in fact, fine. 

If this chain of events is what takes place every time we step away from our devices and unplug, no one will choose do it. And rightfully so. I do not want to worry my mother into sending me cryptic Pig Latin messages more than anyone else.  

What I’m trying to get at here is this: our connections today are limitless. We are perpetually contact-able and “always-on.”

Technology affords us (I see you Janet Murray!) proof that, no matter where we find ourselves and what time of day it is, we can reach anyone in a fraction of a second. And not just through telephone calls, but also with videos, pictures, Snaps, Facebook Live, you name it. 

So if I told you that in spite of all these awesome technologies and new ways of staying in touch, Americans are becoming lonelier and lonelier, you might not believe me.

And with good reason. Compared to every era before this, getting in touch with someone has never been easier or more effortless. The hardest part might actually be choosing which app, platform or website you want to use.

Stephen Marche of The Atlantic says it well, “In a world consumed by ever more novel modes of socializing, we have less and less actually society.”

Sociologists out of Duke have done multiple studies looking at “nationally representative data on the confidants with whom Americans discuss important matters.” What they’ve found is that 24.6% of all Americans report having no confidants.

That’s one in four Americans.

Another 19.6% say they have one confidant.

Stop and take that in. If that sounds terrifying, it’s because it is. A little less than half of America has at most 1 person with whom they can really talk and let it out.

Why is this so? ask the researchers. They didn’t explicitly set out to find the answer, but made a few guesses. Longer work days and commutes are among those listed. But I’m most intrigued by the third hypothesis: novel ways of communicating thanks to technology.

Screen Shot 2017-04-28 at 10.29.49 PM.png

New technology, people like Jay Rosen understand, places the ball in our courts. These days, those who were formerly the audience are in charge of “publishing and broadcasting ourselves when it meets a need or sounds like fun.”

And guess what, very few of us choose to click share when we’re at the library studying or having a bad day😔.

Liz Hoggard of The Telegraph just the other day wrote, “On paper my life sounds glamorous. My Facebook and Twitter updates show evenings spent at film premieres and West End first nights.”

That’s just it. Online communication and everything we do through our devices is so alluring because it’s artificial.

Sherry Turkle, psychologist and professor at MIT wrote in a 2012 New York Times opinion piece, “Texting and e-mail and posting let us present the self we want to be. This means we can edit. And if we wish to, we can delete. Or retouch: the voice, the flesh, the face, the body. Not too much, not too little — just right.”

Screen Shot 2017-04-28 at 10.56.02 PM.png

We have a huge problem though, and John Cacioppo at the University of Chicago, the leading expert on loneliness, is the first to admit it.

In an age when everyone is so concerned with appearances and generating the perfect self-image, no one wants to admit they are lonely or have humdrum days, weeks or months.

Especially when all of their so-called friends appear to be having the times of their lives, according to Insta and Snapchat.

“Admitting you are lonely is like holding a big L up on your forehead,” says Cacioppo himself. His research has found that “when you’re lonely, your whole body’s lonely.” Social isolation, as it has come to be called, impairs our immune systems and bolsters inflammation.
Loneliness, Cacioppo has found, is about 2x as dangerous as obesity.

Now, don’t get me wrong. I think technology is great. I’d go so far as to say it’s magical.

When I graduate in just over a week, it’s social media that will allow me to stay in touch with friends and professors. Technology will facilitate the upkeep of all the bonds I’ve formed during my time at Emory.

I just think that like everything in life, we need to use it with moderation.

I’m with Turkle, who urges us all to “reclaim conversation.” Face-to-face conversation, that is. It’s why I created the series of images at the top of this page.

Throughout the past few weeks, whenever I’ve come across a friend or other young people so absorbed in their phones, I’ve asked to take a photo of them staring blankly at their hands as if the device were still there.

Everyone I’ve asked initially seems quite confused by my request.

When I’m with these friends for a longer period of time, I’ve noticed that they become uber aware of using (or not using) their devices. My friend Leila went so far as to put her phone away for the rest of our brunch. Out of sight, out of mind I suppose.


I hope that my classmates who listened to my presentation and those in the photographs are able to take something from this. I hope that Dr. Sexson can eventually convince mothers in the NICU to stare at their beautiful babies more than their phones.

Maybe, like boyd, we’ll all be able to strike “a balance, a rhythm that moves us in ways that make us feel whole without ripping our sanity to shreds.”
I know I’m going to make an effort to establish a degree of distance between myself and the devices that were built to make my life easier.
Let’s take a break— here and there, every once in a while— to just turn off and let go. Surround yourself with the people nearby or talk to a new neighbor. As my professor Dr. Dowd always reminds us, you never know who’s on the other side of your wall.
It would be an unreasonable request to ask everyone to completely disconnect from our brilliant, alluring, and sometimes magical gadgets. For they do some outstanding, unimaginable things for us. But I think we’d be a happier, freer people if we knew when enough is enough.

works cited:

boyd, danah. “Participating in the Always-On Lifestyle.” The Social Media Reader. Ed. Michael Mandiberg. New York and London: New York University Press, 2012. 71-76.
Hoggard, Liz. “Life Looks Good on the Surface – so Why Are We All so Lonely?” The Telegraph. Telegraph Media Group, 23 Apr. 2017.
Marche, Stephen. “Is Facebook Making Us Lonely?” The Atlantic. Atlantic Media Company, 19 Feb. 2014.
Pickersgill, Eric. “Photographs.” REMOVED. ©EricPicksergill, 2017.
Rosen, Jay. “The People Formerly Known as the Audience.” The Social Media Reader. Ed. Michael Mandiberg. New York and London: New York University Press, 2012. 13-16.
Ross, Julianne. “The Idea That Online Life Isn’t Real Is Trite- and Harmful.” Wired. Condé Nast, 20 Oct. 2015.
Smith-Lovin, Lynn, Matthew E. Brashears, and Miller McPherson. “Social Isolation in America: Changes in Core Discussion Networks over Two Decades.” American Sociological Review 73.6 (2008): 1022.
Turkle, Sherry. “The Flight From Conversation.” The New York Times Sunday Review. The New York Times Company, 21 Apr. 2012.
Vedantam, Shankhar. “When It Comes To Our Lives On Social Media, ‘There’s Always Another Story’.” Hidden Brain: A Conversation about Life’s Unseen Patterns. NPR, 17 Apr. 2017. Web. 28 Apr. 2017.

eyes on the prize

In the weeks since I decided to take on my own “Removed” project, I have become hyperaware of everyone’s obsession with and addiction to their screens.

Tb-completely-h I have even taken to watching my friends and other random humans in my vicinity as they interact with their digital devices. Whether people want to admit it or not, there is no denying that we spend huge chunks of time zeroed in on our phones, iPads, etc. This is both when we’re alone and together.

But what is becoming ever more present to me is that we are never truly alone– as long as our devices are present. We can be reached whenever and wherever… God forbid we are off the grid for even a second.

With this in mind, I hope to shed some light and reflect on what this means for our bonds. For starters, I plan to reference danah boyd’s article that we read (and which I was critical of from the get-go). I have also found some super fascinating research, such as a 2011 study conducted at the University of Michigan and the awesome work of scholars like Sherry Turkle, the Director of the MIT Initiative on Technology and Self.

Screen Shot 2017-04-19 at 12.18.32 AM.png

Additionally, I want to draw on some alternate sources, including the 2014 spoken word video, “Can We Auto-Correct Humanity?

But I really want to let my photographs do some talking.

I have made a few decisions in this regard. I will not use my iPhone to take the photos, which I initially intended to do. I think this would be going a bit against the grain of my mission.

Vicki_Eric_Pickersgill_Removed.jpgI also tried taking a few photos with my phone (see above), and frankly didn’t love the focus and clarity. Also, please take not of the individual in the background. That was not intentional for the record. Anyway, in order to achieve a look similar to Pickersgill’s, I think I’ll have to take a few steps back in time and use a real deal camera.

In short, I’m really excited. I look forward to gaining some new perspectives on how the online/ digital is affecting our lives both as we use them and when we aren’t. Stay tuned…


At this point, I imagine that my collection of blog posts, in-class comments, and digital essays has indicated my feelings on digital media. On one hand, the magical benefits and #affordances media grant us are immeasurable. Where would we be today if it weren’t for YouTube and Siri (among so many other innovations)?

But at the same time, I’m a bit cautious to call digital media all fun & games. I worry about the effects– good and bad– it’s having on our relationships and way of life.

For my Final Project, I am hoping to create a compilation of photos based on the work of photographer Eric Pickersgill. Much like Pickersgill’s project, Removed, this series of photos will will make a commentary on “the social and physical implications” of personal devices.

Like Pickersgill’s work, I will feature “individuals who appear to be holding personal devices although the devices have been physically removed from the sitter’s hand.” The subject(s) will be asked to hold the same pose and expression. At the same time that I request they remove their device, I will ask for consent to photograph the scene.

Screen Shot 2017-03-28 at 5.20.04 PM.png

It is my intention to use Emory students or anyone younger than college-aged whenever possible. I am interested in photographing this age group, as they are often referred to as “digital natives.” I look forward to discussing their opinions on this subject as well.

I guess what I’m seeking to question is what we miss when we’re too busy to look up from our phones? Or who passes us by when we’re signaling to the world that whatever’s on our screen is more important than them? How has society been altered by technology? And what does this mean?